Where is the push to change the Constitution coming from? Academia, elements of the legal and fraternity, anti-royalist activists. Or is the establishment money-power driving the activity.
The push came to shove under Whitlam, then again during the period of Hawk and Keating all greedy for increased power. The underlying philosophy had changed. It was not so much the distaste for our Anglo-Celtic beginnings but rather the modernised drive for a one-world government system that fired the boilers of the new pushers.
Adding to the push and what has become the major reason for the 1999 referendum, is the populations increasing knowledge as to the illegality of the present establishment/government system resulting on a number of High Court challenges to the governments claimed authority to govern, challenges mounted mainly in the area of taxation because the savings here available to fund the enormous legal costs of the challenge.
It is apparent from the establishment's actions that they see that the whole system could come tumbling down over night, resulting in anarchy and the establishments main concern, a loss of power.
The rush to over come the developing inevitable climax, revolves around getting a totally legal Constitution in place as soon as possible then moving to make legal all the laws passed by the illegal resume that has been operating as Australian government since 1920.
The reality is that it should be the people who are pushing for a fresh Constitution for many of the same reasons but in the main to bring government under the control of the people and re-establish lost ground including their fundamental legal rights.
The push has now got the constitutional change wagon up over the crest, and it is poised to roll on down past the finish line, unstoppable, and at ever-increasing speed, until it passes as a blinding flash through the gates of permanent, non-reversible change, the people have a duty to demand control of this wagon and where it is heading and at what speed it travels.
The so-called conservatives have recently jumped onto the wagon in fear they may will be left behind in the eyes of the internationalists who have a vested interest in this long planed change and its outcome.
The Australian people themselves have not been part of the push for a Constitutional change, rather believing that if the government stuck to the existing rules (Constitution) all would be well.
Unfortunately the people have been kept in the dark about the ever gradual change that has already taken place, placing Australia in very deep water Constitutionally. ( See Australia at Crossroads for a chronology of events)
It is now certain that Australians will be asked to make the changes required by an elite establishment. Who see the opportunity to gain not only permanent but totally legal dictatorial control.
All political factions will do as their parties bid. An attempt to set Australia in place as a State of the World Federation of States - World Government, is part of the agenda. At first under the smoke-screen of ASIAN membership, regional government leaving Australians out-voted by between 200 to 1 or 1,000,000 to 1 depending on whether China is in or out. In other words our Australian vote won’t count.
It can be easily argued that the existing Constitution has not served the Australian people well. Australians have lost considerable ground while government has been supposedly under it’s control, or rather lack of control. At first in the early part of the century but increasingly so since the early seventies.
The existing Constitution has been found wanting, unsuccessful in controlling the Federal Parliament and the High Court alike. The evidence is monumental and is everywhere.
Change is in the air, sprayed in, as if from a pressure pack can. Everybody realises we need change and as a result are ripe to fall for anything. The hype possible as a result of the turn of the century hysteria, aided by the Olympics will create the opportunity for the establishment to create sufficient euphoria in he Australian physic that they will fall for just about anything. The establishment will run us all into ruinous debt in an attempt to create such euphoria.
It would appear there are three Constitutional alternatives.
One, being sold as, stay as we are, No change, with government totally outside the peoples' control.
The only way we can stay as we are is to reject all the proposals, then we automatically stay as we are (without change).
People should not be conned into voting NO thinking that things will stay as they are because they will not, the reason being that a NO vote will approve the very much denuded document being waved around as the Constitution without the essential support documents that originally made it function as probably the best constitution in the world.
Two, to accept a change of name for the Head of State but otherwise, No change---The republican agenda makes it easy to transfer control to aliens in the UN as planned.
Three, putting in place "Alternative Three" a peoples Constitution, to secure the people's proper and permanent control of the Federal Parliament, the High Court, the Executive and all arms of the Australian Government system.
"Alternative Three" is about being prepared - having at the ready - when the time comes - a fully prepared peoples' Constitution, consisting of fresh Constitution based on the existing Constitution, that will truly make the people of Australia a self governing people.
United People Power is dedicated to increasing the knowledge of the people in order that a well-informed people are in a position to make a well-informed decision in November 1999.
Copyright © 1997 United People Power All rights
reserved.
succeed@bigpond.com
Revised: April 21, 2003.